The following great peripherals war will be waged over your ears. After every company on the planet put out a gaming mouse and after that a mechanical keyboard, now it’s time for headsets. So gaming headsets.
We know you don’t want to scroll through every headset review when all you want is a straightforward answer: “What’s the very best gaming headset I can buy with my hard-earned dollars?” This site supports the answer you seek, regardless of what your financial allowance is.
We’ll keep updating our recommendations while we have a look at new releases and look for stronger contenders. Just for this latest update, we’ve reviewed a few fancypants models, namely the Sennheiser Game Zero and and Sennheiser GSP 350, and also the Audio-Technica ATH-AG1X. To get more earthly budgets, we’ve also tested the SteelSeries Arctis 7, the HyperX Cloud Revolver S, as well as the Logitech G533, which debuts as our new best mid-range wireless headset.
Kingston doesn’t have the same pedigree within the headset space as its competitors, although the HyperX Cloud is actually a winning device in a cheap price.
Our 2016 headset recommendation remains pretty much the same as our 2015 headset recommendation (and our 2014, as an example): The Kingston HyperX Cloud. Or, if you’re feeling a little fancier, the Cloud II. It’s comfortable, it may sound great, and (best of all) it’s relatively inexpensive. What else could you want within a headset?
True to its name, the HyperX Cloud is probably the most comfortable headsets in the marketplace. It’s hefty, using a solid-metal construction that belies its cheap price, but sits feather-light around the head. The faux-leather earpieces are generously padded, oversized, and form an effective seal without squeezing too difficult.
And yes it sounds excellent. As mentioned within our review, this isn’t a studio-quality list of headphones. It’s got the normal gaming-centric bass boost as well as a slick high end, but both of them are subtle enough how the HyperX Cloud competes favorably with bluetooth headset twice its price. There’s no Kingston-provided ways to adjust the sound, given that the HyperX Cloud connects through standard 3.5mm jacks, however, you honestly shouldn’t must tweak it in any way from the box. It may sound pretty damn great.
Really the only negative thing is the microphone. It’s very flexible, that i appreciate, but has an inclination to grab background noise and plosives while leaving your voice nasally and hollow.
The slightly-more-expensive HyperX Cloud II is, I think, more a lateral move than an improvement over its predecessor. It swaps the 3.5mm connection for a 7.1-ready USB soundcard with better in-line controls and a certain amount of noise cancellation in the microphone, nevertheless, you wouldn’t notice a huge distinction between the 2 iterations and I’m unclear the increase in cost makes it worth while.
Regardless, either model is a superb choice for a gaming headset. Within an increasingly crowded market, the HyperX Cloud nails virtually every major category with few significant compromises. I really hope the next model improves about the microphone, however for $80 it’s a steal.
The Cloud Stinger provides solid sound, serious comfort, as well as an attractive design for anyone who just wants a “good enough” headset without having wallet-shock.
HyperX’s Cloud headset remains our favorite, however the company undercut themselves a bit by releasing the HyperX Cloud Stinger. Listed at $50, it’s among the cheapest gaming headsets I’ve experienced from the reputable brand. And it’s good.
Sure, it’s not quite as effective as the original Cloud, but for most people the Stinger ought to do just great. The plastic chassis lacks some of the original Cloud’s panache and sturdiness, but looks high-end from the distance and sits pretty slim in the head. HyperX also solved the Cloud’s biggest issue lastly put a volume slider straight at the base from the right earcup and gave it a flip-to-mute microphone, so no more fiddling within-line controls.
With regards to audio, the Cloud Stinger’s got a great mid-range with little to no distortion even at high volumes. The treble is underpowered along with the bass range is practically nonexistent, but 80 percent of any given game, film, or song should come through clear and clean.
If you already have a significant headset, specially the original Cloud, I wouldn’t say the Stinger is essential-own. However, if you’re looking for an excellent value on entry-level hardware, this can be it. It’s an insane bargain when you compare it with other headsets in the same price tier.
At merely under $100, Corsair’s Void Wireless is mainly a great wireless headset, but you will encounter some compromises.
Frankly speaking, Corsair doesn’t genuinely have any competition with this category. Most decent wireless gaming headsets will run you $150 or more. Corsair’s Void Wireless is priced in a mere $100, which leaves it on its lonesome.
But even making up that vacuum, it’s pretty good. Not phenomenal, mind you, but at this price you’re getting a bargain.
I wasn’t really sure what to make from the Void’s weird, diamond-shaped ear cups but after a little use I’m actually pretty pleased. The Void Wireless sits a lttle bit forward about the head, with the band resting just above your forehead. It takes some getting used to, but the end result is less tension on the jaw and more on the rear of the top where it’s less noticeable. I wouldn’t say it’s as comfortable because the classical HyperX Cloud, but undeniably I love it a lot more than its predecessor, the H2100.
The on-headset controls are fairly intuitive, with a volume rocker on the bottom in the left ear, plus oversized buttons for power and mute around the side. And it’s got 16.8 million color RGB lighting, if that’s your bag.
The greatest design issue would be that the Void Wireless is heavy. It’s not a problem when sitting up, however, if you peer down or check out the headset has a propensity to slide around. I don’t know whether it’s due to battery or perhaps the metal-augmented construction, yet your neck receives a workout with this particular headset.
Sound-wise, the Void Wireless still needs some work. It appears passable, especially while gaming, but throwing on some music sets the Void Wireless’s limitations into stark relief. The low-end is muddy and distorted, along with the whole array of mid-to-high-end frequencies sounds slick, like you’ve applied a lot of compression.
You can adjust the headset’s sound in Corsair’s software, but Corsair’s software is still somewhat unwieldy. A lot better than this past year, I think, yet still not on par with Razer, SteelSeries, or Logitech. Also, many folks have reported problems with firmware updates-not really a great sign.
“This doesn’t could be seen as a tremendously positive review,” you could say. And you’re right, it’s not. The Void Wireless will not be an incredible headset, as mentioned up top. Yet it is the ideal wireless gaming headset under $150, and given the number of wires are affixed to my PC at virtually any moment, the convenience of cheap wireless may be worth sacrificing a little bit of quality of sound.
Logitech’s G533 doesn’t have quite the same breadth of options since the G933, but a much more restrained design and a bargain price make this a solid contender for best wireless headset.
It’s a tricky call replacing our former mid-tier wireless pick, the Logitech G933, with its sibling-successor the Logitech G533. Like, really tough. The G933 is a wonderful headset, with crisp and well-balanced audio and a few nifty design features (like having the capability to keep the USB dongle inside an earcup).
But I’m still replacing it. Why? Well, aesthetics can be a huge reason. If you need an indication how Logitech’s design language has shifted before year roughly, your search is over gam1ngheadset the G933 and G533. The G933 was all sharp angles and science fiction. The G533 alternatively is sleek, professional, restrained. By using a piano-black finish and soft curves, it seems such as a headset made by Audio-Technica or Sennheiser or perhaps a more mainstream audio company-possibly not a “gaming” headset. I enjoy it.
The G533’s design is additionally functional. The microphone isn’t as hidden as I’d like, but that’s the only flaw. The headset is lightweight, durable, and less vise-grip tight than its predecessor.
In terms of audio fidelity? It’s not quite comparable to the G933, nevertheless the differences are minimal. The G533 lacks some oomph, especially at lower volumes, as well as its 7.1 support is subpar. Those are hardly reasons to stay away, though-the majority of people will run the headset loud enough to counteract the headset’s insufficient presence, and virtual 7.1 is (in my view) basically always bad. The G533 is worse compared to the average, however the average is still something I choose to prevent day-to-day.
In any event, the G933 remains to be being sold which is an absolutely good choice for several, particularly if you want console support. The G533 is PC-only, as the G933 can be attached by 3.5mm cable for some other devices. And in case you value comfort over audio fidelity, have a look at the SteelSeries Arctis 7 too-another excellent choice.
Astro’s new A50 touts a whole new charging station and better controls, but still doesn’t put the audio you could possibly expect coming from a $300 kind of headphones.
SteelSeries Siberia 800 Wireless Dolby 7.1 Gaming Headset
After having a new generation of the computer headphone and Siberia 800 released in 2016, I thought we may finally break the tie that’s dominated our splurge headset pick within the last several years.
But once again, there’s no clear winner in that $300 price-though Astro certainly made some strides toward edging out SteelSeries.
The latest A50’s biggest improvement is definitely the battery. The latest model overcomes an extended-running weak spot and packs in 12 to 15 hours of life-enough to obtain through a good long day of gaming. Even better, it features gyroscopes inside the ears that give it time to detect whether you’ve set it up down. It automatically shuts off ten seconds later then, then turns back and connects for your PC on as soon as you pick it back up. Its base station also serves as a charger, a good mixture of function and beauty.